Welcome back Tink.
Indeed.
Apparently, in the age of clickbait, the rigor for "Scientfic Studies" has slipped somewhat. Not that women, or men need an excuse for suckling, but that's one hell of a line! Let me suck your nipples, or you'll get cancer.
Scientists proved what you always wanted to believe! How? How do you prove that, by a study? I like to think they had a room full of women, hundreds of topless women with men answering an ad in the paper. Sorry, make that Craigslist, and sucking their nipples. Of course, that would require a Control, you can't say how more likely A particular woman is to get Cancerous tumors unless you also have a room full of women not getting their nipples sucked. Who wouldn't want to be the doctor in that study, examining the breasts for lumps?
Or, Statistically. Correlation is not causation, but Parthenogenesis is a Victorian theory. We know the mechanisms that lead to Cancer. Not doing something, leaving those puppies alone is not a Carcenogen, and women don't just suddenly erupt into fatty growths that might be a tumor. Men get breast cancer too, where's the study on male nipples being sucked? Do most men have their nipples sucked, and if not, then why isn't breast cancer more comon in men? I had my nipples sucked once, and I didn't get breast cancer, so it must be working, just like this Tiger repellant I always carry with me, just in case. Could there be another factor, not represented in this study?
I'm an engineer, I troubleshot factories to try and figure out what went wrong, and a factory is orders of magnitude less complex than a potted fern. Much less a woman, so when looking at studies like this, I like to run through the checklist of things an Oncologist would. Not a breast fetishist. How does nipple suckling prevent the fatty growths that turn into tumors, exactly? Would leaches work as well? What about cupping?
Occam's Guillotine: Deciding the conclusion, then looking for the evidence to "Prove" it is like cutting off your head so you don't have to shave.
