Ravishment University

THE UNIVERSITY => Ravishment, Forced Sex, and BDSM topics => Topic started by: skuttrusk on August 13, 2016, 08:56:05 AM

Title: The Law
Post by: skuttrusk on August 13, 2016, 08:56:05 AM
THESE NEW CHANGES IN THE LAWS REGARDING RAPE HAVE BEEN VERY CONTROVERSIAL, MINISTER.

Well, be that as it may, I think the figures speak for themselves. Authenticated cases of rape have dropped by 97% since the new laws were brought in. I call that a success.

BY "AUTHENTICATED" YOU MEAN CONVICTIONS. BUT CHARGES OF RAPE HAVE ACTUALLY INCREASED.

There may be more false accusations than before, but since we brought in stricter measures to guard against false conviction, actual authenticated rapes have dropped to almost zero. As I say, a success.

SOME SAY THESE STRICTER MEASURES ARE TOO STRINGENT.

Requiring a neutral witness to each rape strikes me as quite reasonable, otherwise it's merely "he said she said."

YOU HAVE ALSO DECREASED SENTENCES FOR THOSE WHO ARE CONVICTED.

The evidence shows that custodial sentences have little deterrent effect on rapists. Most of them re-offend. So there's no point in locking them up for years at great expense. A few weeks is sufficient to express society's disapproval.

THERE IS ALSO CONCERN ABOUT THE AUTOMATIC PERJURY CONVICTIONS...

It is quite obvious that when a case has been heard and the supposed rapist has been found innocent, this proves that the supposed victim is nothing but a lying slut. Finding her instantly guilty of perjury saves time and money, as does the fixed sentence of six months.

AND THE UNUSUAL NATURE OF THAT SENTENCE?

Let the punishment fit the crime, I say. we have found that since we started sending these sluts to male prisons to provide sexual relief for the prisoners, crimes and disturbances in prison have dropped massively. So it's an obvious social good. We are currently looking at other ways we can forcibly recruit nubile females for this purpose. When every male prisoner has his own sex slave, our jails will be truly calm places of reform.

YOU YOURSELF HAVE FACED ALLEGATIONS OF RAPE

Yes, and I'm proud to say I've been cleared on all seven occasions, as I hope to be in future. The seven sluts who accused me are now doing time at Her Majesty's pleasure. I'm told each has to service twenty inmates a day. That'll teach the little cunts to tell tales.

MINISTER, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND THE BEST OF LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE RAPING.

Thank you, and the same to you.

*The above is a fantasy.* Suggestions appreciated.
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: Evelika on August 23, 2016, 12:59:50 PM
Haha, delightful, thanks.  ;D

We have found that since we started sending these sluts to male prisons to provide sexual relief for the prisoners, crimes and disturbances in prison have dropped massively. So it's an obvious social good. We are currently looking at other ways we can forcibly recruit nubile females for this purpose. When every male prisoner has his own sex slave, our jails will be truly calm places of reform.

This is a very fond, recurring theme for me.   l love the idea of sexual relief ruled a basic human right, so [esp. hetero] male inmates would have to be supplied with appropriate sexual outlets: i.e. women. 

Things like combining male and female penitentiaries, having girls charged with lesser (or made up) crimes be required to perform community service hours on their knees or bent over at a local prison, and male guards or visitors (including family & friends) able to legally use any attractive female inmate in jail or juvie - because he would just be helping to make sure her needs are being met, of course :angel: - are all fun variations for me. 

I also find it amusing to imagine punishment for female criminals invariably being sexual in nature - shoplifters restrained in a store for paying customers' use; jaywalkers strapped to street sign poles, kneeling and ring-gagged; truant students put in stocks near their schools, with teachers and fellow students alike casually using them... you get the idea.  ;)

This extends to courtrooms, naturally, with arrangements made for male jurors to be discreetly serviced during potentially arousing rape trials, so they won't be uncomfortable or distracted, making female witnesses endure humiliating reenactments of the event, both by the accused and judge/jurors, so they could better understand the logistics for decision-making, judges and male lawyers allowed to "question" a witness (or "confer" with a pretty female lawyer) in private, with the man returning to the courtroom looking relaxed and smug, and the woman tear-streaked and disheveled, and the trial just continuing as normal.

Dunno what to suggest, but happy to read anything else you care to write!
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: skuttrusk on August 24, 2016, 03:54:26 PM
MINISTER, THESE NEW STATUTES, WHEREBY WOMEN CONVICTED OF EVEN THE MOST MINOR OFFENCE AUTOMATICALLY RECEIVE CUSTODIAL SENTENCES, ARE PROVING CONTROVERSIAL.

Ah, but controversial with whom? Women, no doubt, and who cares what they think. I haven't heard any complaints from the staff and inmates of our prisons, who are now supplied with a plentiful supply of sex slaves to relieve their tension. Our prisons have never been happier and more peaceful.

YES, BUT THESE SUPPOSED CRIMES: JAYWALKING, LITTERING, AND THIS ONE: CONTRADICTION. WHAT DOES THAT ACTUALLY MEAN?

Perfectly simple, I should have thought. Any woman caught repeatedly contradicting a superior male can be sentenced to three months at her Majesty's Pleasure, or as we now say, at Her Majesty's convicts' pleasure.

THERE HAVE BEEN DISTURBING REPORTS OF BRUTALITY IN THESE PRISONS...

Not disturbing to me. It's only right that men, making use of a slut in such circumstances, may use her brutally if that's what gives them the most satisfaction. Or perhaps you're referring to the system of corporal punishment imposed to make sure the sluts perform their sexual duties with suitable enthusiasm. These punishments, which range from floggings to canings, may be brutal, but they serve an important purpose.

HOW EXACTLY DO YOU ESTABLISH THAT A "SLUT", AS YOU PUT IT, HAS NOT BEEN ENTHUSIASTIC ENOUGH?

Each prisoner fills out a report on the slut pleasuring him. If he gives her a black mark, she gets six of the best at week's end. Since each slut will be expected to offer her body to ten men a day, this can add up to quite a thrashing if she's lacklustre or sloppy, but it's all in the interests of discipline.

ISN'T IT TRUE THAT THESE PUNISHMENTS ARE CARRIED OUT IN PUBLIC, IN VIEW OF THE WHOLE PRISON, AND THAT PRISONERS ROUTINELY GIVE BLACK MARKS JUST TO SEE THE WOMEN WHIPPED?

This may be occurring in some instances, but I don't see any need to be concerned. These women are convicts, after all, many of them guilty of serious crimes.

PAYING THEIR TV LICENSE LATE? PARKING AT AN AWKWARD ANGLE?

Precisely. A few months rape and beating is the best thing for them. The little whores.
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: scarleth on September 03, 2016, 10:24:35 PM
Please write stories on the subject. It's very hot!
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: skuttrusk on September 05, 2016, 05:25:16 AM
MINISTER, WHAT IS YOUR RESPONSE TO THE CASE OF LARA SMITH?

Response? Other than a sense of satisfaction and a hard-on?

MINISTER, IS IT POSSIBLE WE'RE DISCUSSING THE SAME CASE. THIS IS LARA SMITH, THE EIGHTEEN-YEAR-OLD SCHOOLGIRL WHO WAS SET UPON BY A GROUP OF SEVEN THIRTY-YEAR-OLD BUSINESSMEN, STRIPPED OF HER SCHOOL UNIFORM AND GANG RAPED. SHE WAS LEFT NAKED, TIED TO A LAMP POST ON A COLD AUTUMN NIGHT, AND IN THE MORNING THE FIRST FOUR MEN WHO FOUND HER, RATHER THAN UNTYING HER OR ALERTING THE PROPER AUTHORITIES, RAPED HER AGAIN. AND ONE OF THESE RAPISTS WAS A POLICEMAN.

Yes, that sounds like the same girl. Rather amusing story, what?

MINISTER, NEED I REMIND YOU THAT WHEN MISS SMITH TOOK HER ASSAILANTS TO COURT, THE OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE RESULTED IN CONVICTIONS FOR TEN OF THE ELEVEN RAPISTS -

I recall seeing the CCTV footage on the news. Hours of it, and jolly hot stuff it was too. They certainly didn't spare her anything. And I gather the little tease had been a virgin. Heh heh.

- BUT THAT THE JUDGE LET THEM OFF WITH A WARNING. BUT BECAUSE THE JURY DECLINED TO CONVICT THE POLICEMAN -

Splendid record, that fellow has.

SPLENDID? HE'S BEEN ACCUSED OF RAPE THIRTY-SEVEN TIMES!

But never convicted. Sensible chap.

DESPITE VIDEO EVIDENCE, EYEWITNESS REPORTS, AND HIS OWN BRAGGING TO THE NEWSPAPERS, "I LOVE IT WHEN THE WRIGGLE AND WEEP..."

Ha, don't we all?

THE POINT IS, BECAUSE ONE OF ELEVEN OF HER RAPISTS WAS FOUND INNOCENT DESPITE AL THE EVIDENCE, LARA WAS AUTOMATICALLY CONVICTED OF PERJURY AND WAS SENTENCED TO A YEAR'S SEXUAL SERVITUDE.

The law must be obeyed. Anyway, surely this is a social good. At large in society, Miss Smith selfishly kept her body to herself, and only eleven men were able to take advantage of its bounty. Now in custody, she must service a minimum of a hundred and forty men a week. The slut has finally become a useful member of society.

ALL THAT MAY BE TRUE, MINISTER, BUT WHAT ABOUT YOUR DECISION, AS MINISTER FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT, TO GRANT THE ELEVEN ORIGINAL RAPISTS THE RIGHT TO CONJUGAL VISITS? THEY ARE NOW VISITING LARA IN PRISON AND ABUSING HER STILL MORE. ISN'T THAT SOMETHING OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF?

Far from it. I'm PROUD of the compassionate way we treat these men, who are, in their own way, every bit as much victims as the sluts they violate.

MINISTER, I UNDERSTAND THAT LARA SMITH'S LAWYERS HAVE WRITTEN YOU AN APPEAL AGAINST HER TREATMENT IN PRISON. TWENTY MEN USING HER FOR AN HOUR EACH EVERY DAY, PLUS HER RAPISTS VISITING HER WHENEVER THEY LIKE, AND WEEKLY BEATINGS IF SHE FAILS TO COMPLETELY SATISFY EVERY PRISONER AND/OR GUARD WHO MAKES USE OF HER...

The answer to the beatings is, try harder, bitch, and it shouldn't be necessary to beat you!

WHAT WILL BE YOUR RESPONSE TO THIS APPEAL FOR MERCY?

My response will be swift but considered. I'm going to add a year onto her sentence. I look forward to her next appeal with enthusiasm. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have the cutest little mixed-race girl tied up naked in my office, and I've just purchased a new selection of whips. Unless you'd care to join me...

OH... WELL... PERHAPS JUST ONCE...
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: drakan on September 05, 2016, 11:45:58 AM
I don't know what place this minister is in charge of, but I'd like to move there
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: Evelika on September 07, 2016, 12:17:32 PM
Not my image or caption, but reminded me of you. for some reason. :P

http://gph.is/2ci2M2S
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: skuttrusk on September 07, 2016, 12:47:33 PM
Nice gif! The eternal, cyclic nature of the gif makes it ideally suited to porn, but even better to sadistic rape porn. Tied her up and fuck her FOREVER...
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: Evelika on September 07, 2016, 01:28:10 PM
There's always the possibility of redemption through community service: girls installed as public utilities (free or coin-operated) -
http://gph.is/2cCxUK6
http://gph.is/2ckOyNP
http://gph.is/2cCysj8
http://gph.is/2cdIaHG
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: Tony V. on September 07, 2016, 04:17:18 PM
Excuse Me, but I've been accused of the Criminal Act of Rape Thirty NINE times..... Unlawful Carnal Knowledge Twenty times, and I've brought Charges against Forty Three Men, and Six Females......


Tony V.              :police:
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: LezRapist on September 09, 2016, 03:22:12 PM
Love this stuff, keep it coming!  :emot_kiss.gif:
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: skuttrusk on September 10, 2016, 09:45:03 AM
MINISTER, THE CASE OF LARA SMITH KEEPS DEVELOPING. WHAT IS YOUR RESPONSE TO THE FACT THAT SHE'S GONE ON HUNGER STRIKE, PROTSTING, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE FACT THAT THE MEN SHE ACCUSED OF RAPE ARE BEING ALLOWED CONJUGAL VISITS.

First, I defend the practice of conjugal visits. The men who made such enthusiastic use of Miss Smith, though they knew her for only a short time, the duration of a single gang bang, formed a deep connection with her. Nine inches deep, in some cases, I believe. Aha ha. Now, does it seem fair to deny them the right to play with her, just because she has fallen foul of the law and been detained. Preventing them from using her just as savagely as they might do if she were at liberty, that, I submit, would be a gross injustice.

BUT WON'T IT BE A TRAGEDY IF SHE STARVES HERSELF TO DEATH.

Don't exaggerate. The first difficulty would be if she lost enough weight to become unattractive. That would be a true shame. We've all seen the nude pictures in the newspapers and we know what an attractive little piece of ass she is. Just the risk that she might render that shapely form unworthy of raping is a criminal act and should be treated as such. I'm seriously considering extending her sentence. Fortunately, a solution is on hand to thwart this foolish diet.

YOU DON'T MEAN FORCE-FEEDING, WHICH HAS BEEN OUTLAWED AS INHUMANE?

No, what I have implemented does not technically fall under that heading. Miss Smith's duties as fuckpuppet at the Cosby Maximum Security Prison have always included oral services. Now, by forcing her to wear a ring gag for twenty four hours a day, we can ensure she services fifty to a hundred prisoners in that time. A guard is on hand to ensure she swallows every sticky drop deposited between her lush, rape-able young lips. Now, semen has a high protein content, so I don't think we need worry about any unfortunate weight loss.

THANK YOU, MINISTER. AN IMAGINATIVE AND HUMANE SOLUTION TO A DIFFICULT PROBLEM.

Glad to be of service. Of course, the slut's anal and vaginal duties will continue as normal.

NATURALLY. I IMAGINE SHE WILL SOON BE REQUESTING A NORMAL PRISON DIET.

It's possible she is already doing so, but of course we can't be expected to understand her with that gag in place all the time.
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: Evelika on September 10, 2016, 08:07:51 PM
I'm slightly confused - this was the judge who sentenced poor Miss Smith, correct?  And yet he refers to having seen her hot body in print.  Is it possible he didn't sample her himself, before making his judgment, or even sentencing?  The former seems lazy, and the latter seems irresponsible (how can she be designated as a sex toy for incarcerated men, if the judge isn't certain she's enjoyable enough to satisfy them?).  Watching a few hours of video seems like hardly enough to base a decision on.  Were her jurors were allowed to ask questions or examine the plaintiff for themselves, and what is the norm now?

I'm also curious whether Lara Smith's case is still considered unusual, or if it was just sensational because it was the first sentencing of its kind.  Now that a precedent has been set, I'm wondering how many other women are condemned to similar fates - and for what crimes? False rape claims only?  Are conjugal visits between exonerated rapists and incarcerated accusers now commonplace? Have such visits been expanded to include others, possibly friends, teachers, coworkers - or even just curious members of the public?  Perhaps a provision for a nominal visitor's fee, to offset any extra security measures the conjugal visits may warrant?  Would the right to a conjugal visit cancel out, say, a restraining order, allowing someone access to the inmate who previously had to keep a distance from her?  
Lastly, what about family members?  If an inmate was spending all that time servicing male prisoners (and guards, other staff) and receiving conjugal visitors in her spare time, it seems that those who hold them dearest may have the least access to them.  Would it make sense, then, to also allow, say, fathers, uncles, and other concerned male relatives regularly scheduled conjugal visits?

Sorry for all the questions ; I'm just a very avid student of legal matters. :D
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: skuttrusk on September 11, 2016, 01:39:19 AM
Note: The Minister is responsible for the changes in the law, but he isn't the judge who sentenced Lara Smith. But he's aware of her case.

MINISTER, I WONDER IF THERE IS ANY PROGRESS IN THE CASE OF LARA SMITH?

Yes, I can report that after three months in a ring gag, on a cum diet, she has been restored to regular meals. The inmates do like to squirt a little semen on as flavouring to whatever she gets to eat, but she's enjoying life a lot more now that she understands her place. Regular whippings have helped, of course. I myself visited her, and though she was naturally somewhat distressed to learn that her sentence has been increased to three years, she nevertheless proved a most eager bedmate. I do believe she thought I might grant her some kind of reprieve! When I told her this was out of the question, she became agitated and I had to, well, slap her around a little. Her disruptive behaviour was quietened with the help of the guards, who kindly held her down while I pummelled her. The upshot was another six months added on her sentence.
But other than that she's settling in nicely, and can now take even the largest cocks in her ass. Lube is in such short supply in our prisons... I must remember to do something about that...

AND HOW ABOUT THE CASE OF DONNA BAXTER?

Donna Baxter... remember, we now have thousands of young women incarcerated as cum receptacles. I can't be expected to keep track of every slut...

BUT THIS IS A WOMAN YOU YOURSELF RAPED, MINISTER.

Oh, that one! Well, I reject the word "raped." I made use of her. I didn't require her consent so I didn't ask for it. Then she made her ridiculous accusation, her case was flung out immediately, and now she's serving an extended sentence of five years, being much more useful to society with all three holes...

THE CONTROVERSY IS OVER WHETHER SHE ACTUALLY ATTEMPTED TO PRESS CHARGES...

Well, there may be some confusion over her case being fast-tracked. When things are rushed through the legal system, things like that can get blurred. Now, this girl did REPORT being raped. She may or may not have gone so far as to press charges. But a report of rape is still a very serious matter, especially when a senior political figure with an unimpeachable reputation is mentioned. I'm fully satisfied that the matter was handled correctly.

APPARENTLY CONJUGAL VISITS HAVE BEEN GRANTED TO HER STEPFATHER, DESPITE HER HAVING HAD A COURT ORDER BANNING HIM FROM APPROACHING HER.

Well, prison can often be a place where family connections are restored. It's true, she doesn't seem to welcome these visits for now. And a prison block is not the perfect place for parental quality time, with the daughter tied face down in a ball gag. And no lube to be had. But she has five years to get accustomed to his visits. Minimum.

Title: Re: The Law
Post by: Algore on September 11, 2016, 07:02:26 AM
Lol!


Well-crafted. Good work!
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: skuttrusk on September 11, 2016, 03:41:43 PM
MINISTER, WE UNDERSTAND THAT, DESPITE YOUR ASSURANCES THAT LARA SMITH, THE NINETEEN-YEAR-OLD GIRL CONVICTED UNDER SOMEWHAT BIZARRE CIRCUMSTANCES OF MAKING A FALSE CLAIM OF RAPE, WAS NO RECEIVING NORMAL PRISON MEALS, SHE IS IN FACT BACK ON THE RATHER SPECIALISED DIET PREVIOUSLY PRESCRIBED.

That is correct. The girl had been overeating, and the prisoners who made use of her body had complained it was getting fat. The simplest way to ensure the slut maintains a healthy figure was to fit her with a full-time ring gag again and allow her to eat only cum. She is constantly being forced to swallow dollops of the stuff anyway, so if we're thinking of reducing her protein intake, it was the solids that had to go.

We also treated her with a course of purgatives, and after an unpleasant few days, she lost a reasonable amount of weight and can be considered fuckable again. I consider it a very happy outcome.

BUT IS THE GIRL HERSELF HAPPY?

As far as anyone can tell. She has a healthy body, she's performing the function she was intended for, at a singularly intensive rate, and giving a lot of pleasure to those around her. Isn't that happiness?

IS IT TRUE THAT YOU'VE REFUSED TO ALLOW THE PRESS TO INTERVIEW HER?

The gentlemen of the press have enjoyed full access to Miss Smith. Unfortunately, since she is not allowed to remove her gag, they weren't able to get her story, but I understand they made sure their trip was not wasted. As I say, they enjoyed FULL access to her. And the photographs they took show just how healthy she's looking: slim stomach, full breasts, glossy hair...

AND THE WHIP MARKS ON HER BACK?

Prison discipline must be maintained.

ONE REPORTER ALLEGES HE SAW HER BEING BEATEN BY A PRISONER, NOT A GUARD, AND MERELY FOR THE PRISONER'S ENTERTAINMENT.

I don't see why you should say "merely." The man's serving a life sentence. Entertainment is all he's got. The fellow has to let off steam somehow! I like to think we run a humane prison service in this country.
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: LezRapist on September 11, 2016, 04:36:24 PM
More please! I find these little "interviews" to be highly arousing.  Institutional rape has always been a big turn on for me, along with the idea of "corrective" rape.
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: PurpleMan on September 12, 2016, 12:28:06 AM
More please! I find these little "interviews" to be highly arousing.  Institutional rape has always been a big turn on for me, along with the idea of "corrective" rape.

Yeah, institutional rape is definitely really hot for some reason.
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: skuttrusk on September 12, 2016, 05:47:15 PM
MINISTER, CONCERNS CONTINUE TO BE RAISED OVER THE CASE OF IMPRISONED DONNA BAXTER, WHOSE STEPFATHER IS BEING ALLOWED CONJUGAL VISITS AGAINST HER WISHES.

There's really no story here. Miss Baxter has forfeited certain freedoms as a result of committing a serious crime against society.

REPORTING SHE WAS RAPED IS A CRIME AGAINST SOCIETY?

If she say I did it, yes, it is. Her stepfather, on the other hand, is a free man, who ought to be able to enjoy all the freedoms society allows. Showing a paternal concern, he chooses to spend much of his time visiting with Donna.

YES, THREE HOUR CONJUGAL VISITS. ISN'T THAT A LITTLE EXCESSIVE?

Well, we did worry that this was cutting into the slut's schedule: by the specifications of her sentence she's supposed to pleasure not less than twenty male prisoners a day. But we've found that by deducting the three hours from her sleeping time, she's able to fulfill all her obligations.

QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ASKED AS TO WHY SHE'S IN AN ADULT PRISON AND NOT A JUVENILE DETENTION CENTRE.

It's simply a question of where she can be most useful. At present, the demand in our maximum security prisons for girls to serve as physical spitoons for our more violent inmates is higher than the, still very real, needs among teenage boys. But we hope to be able to make their incarcerate lives more... comfortable soon. New changes in the law will see the more... advanced girls at secondary school punished with custodial sentences for lapses of discipline in their education.

WHAT SORT OF INFRACTIONS WOULD RESULT IN THESE GIRLS BEING MADE INTO SEX SLAVES?

Truancy. Swearing. Lateness. Inattention in class. Failure to wear the school uniform (and i can exclusively report that this government is making some radical and long-overdue modifications to the standard school uniform, at least for girls). Insolence. Refusal to be sociable with their male teachers...

HOW DO YOU DEFINE FAILURE TO BE SOCIABLE?

Oh, I leave it to the teachers to do that. you can't have hard and fast rules for everything.

SURELY YOU WON'T MAKE THESE YOUNGER GIRLS SERVICE TWENTY MEN A DAY FOR A PERIOD OF YEARS?

No, on the time-honoured principle of the "short, sharp shock," we're likely to favour shorter sentences so as not to interrupt the sluts' eduation, but these sentences, although spanning only a few months, will be intensive. To correct a girl who has started up the wrong path, you must show firmness. We're thinking of making them each take fifteen cocks in their mouths, fifteen in their pussies, and fifteen up their tight little arseholes, every day.

SOME MIGHT CALL THIS INHUMANE.

All sentences will be supervised by our dedicated prison visitors. And I can proudly say that the number of people applying for those posts has multiplied a hundredfold since we began to instigate these changes.
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: Evelika on September 13, 2016, 12:19:27 AM



Wow, those poor girls! 
(http://i.giphy.com/l2Sq0JjV8xZqOmnzW.gif)

  At least the family part is heartwarming.  ;D

(http://i.imgur.com/Y9RzVRc.jpg)

I wonder whether live-feed video is being widely broadcast, so that the public may ensure none of the women are being mistreated - especially the younger, more fragile ones.

(http://i.giphy.com/l2SpMi9BdQDCDVOeI.gif)
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: skuttrusk on September 13, 2016, 08:16:00 PM
MINISTER, HOW IS PROGRESS ON YOUR PLAN TO KEEP EVERY PRISON SUPPLIED WITH FEMALES FOR THE PRISONERS' USE?

On the whole, excellent. At most of our instututions the rape racks are fully stocked 24/7, with the cocksockets serving 12 hour shifts. In some institutions, prisoners can enjoy a session once a week, while in others I'm proud to say they can visit several times a day. And the live video feeds have been very popular.

SOME HAVE SUGGESTED CHARGING A FEE FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO WATCH THE FEEDS, THUS DEFRAYING THE COSTS.

I think that would be wrong in principle. Letting the public SEE justice be done is an important principle of democracy. I am determined to hold to the principle that the costs of the video feed, which are considerable, should be paid by the women and girls themselves, in the form of a fine. If the slut runs out of funds during her imprisonment and cannot pay, her sentence is increased.

FAIR ENOUGH. HOW ARE HYGIENE STANDARDS BEING MAINTAINED IN THESE CONDITIONS?

It varies from prison to prison. The chief problem is the accumulation of semen in the sluts' holes. In the mouth, of course, it is simply swallowed - or else the slut gets a beating (laughs), but the rest of the ejaculate gathers and can eventually render raping the girl a chore rather than a pleasure.
In some prisons, off-duty girls are required to suck the sperm from the bound girls' openings, and swallow it. This maintains a healthy and attractive environment. Otherwise, the girls can be douched with a piece of standard prison equipment repurposed for vaginal/anal use.

WHAT EQUIPMENT IS THAT?

The water cannon. By lowering the pressure a little - not too much - we've found that quite an effective clean-out can be achieved.
Title: Re: The Law
Post by: skuttrusk on September 15, 2016, 05:43:43 AM
MINISTER, THE PUBLIC HAS BEEN FOLLOWING WITH INTEREST THE CASE OF LARA SMITH -

Lara Smith no more. In line with new government directives, the prisoner formerly known as Lara Smith has been assigned a new name, more in keeping with her status in life. The unwanted celebrity which has made her prison life very difficult, with the whole country knowing the intimate details of her "rape case", laughably so-called, will be somewhat lessened and the girl can pursue a new life, with greater dignity under her state-assigned name.

WHICH IS?

Cum-holes.

CUM-HOLES?

We thought it was appropriate. A list was drawn up with various possibilities, and I selected Cum-holes as the best possible description of her personality.

HOW HAS SHE REACTED TO THE NEW NAME?

Well, she didn't care for it at first. But she gets quite severely whipped if she resorts to her obsolete birth name, so I believe he has reached the stage where she prefers to be called Cum-holes than to have her breasts whipped.

AND HER FAMILY?

One must always consider the feelings of the family. It is naturally difficult for her poor parents and siblings to get used to the change. We have tattooed the words MY NAME IS CUM-HOLES on Cum-holes' neck, to help remind them to get it right. And Cum-holes is punished just as severely when a family member uses her old name as when she does it herself, so they're slowly learning.

DOES LARA SMITH - I BEG YOUR PARDON - DOES CUM-HOLES HAVE ANY PROSPECT OF REMISSION FROM HER SENTENCE?

Hmm, now YOU just used her old name. Should we punish her for that? I suppose we ought to. As to your question, no, I'm afraid her sentence has been lengthened again. Cum-holes suffered a progressive anal complaint as a result of the number of times she was being ass-fucked... initially this manifested itself as a slackening which the prisoners complained diminished their pleasure. We were easily able to apply alum, which restored her asshole to a virginal tightness, which the prisoners then took great pleasure in violating. But as a result of that, the problem grew worse, and as a result Cum-holes has had an embargo placed on her anus for six months. During that time we have increased her vaginal and oral workload,  just to keep the prisoners happy, but naturally the full six months still has to be added to her sentence.

NATURALLY.

Now Lara - tsk, now I've done it. Must make a note to order another breast-whipping. Cum-holes, as I started to say, will be put through a rigorous anal training when she's not in use on the rape rack. Not very pleasant, but necessary. We've had to reduce her rest period to accommodate the doctors' needs, and the medical bills may drain her finances in which case we'll have to find another way for her to pay them off.

HAS DONNA BAXTER ALSO BEEN ASSIGNED A NEW NAME?

Yes, and of course I shall have to order her whipped because you just used her old one.

WHAT IS THE NEW NAME?

We've selected Rape-meat as the name that most captures her charm. An interesting note: in the prison where Cum-holes is detained, the girls are restrained on their bellies in the rape racks, so whipping Cum-holes' breasts does not spoil her appearance for the prisoners who use her. But in the institution where Rape-meat has been assigned, girls are strapped into something resembling the diaper position. So Rape-meat is punished by what is known as the bastinado.

WHIPPING ON THE SOLES OF THE FEET?

Precisely. This has rendered her unable to walk, so she crawls everywhere, her great udders swinging below her (very well-developed young girl), but this hasn't caused any inconvenience. Now, unfortunately, her stepfather refuses point blank to use her new name.

HE DOESN'T LIKE IT?

He does like it, but he likes to see Rape-meat get whipped even more. Well, there's only so many times you can whip a slut's feet, so we have had to thrash her elsewhere on occasion. But we can whip her breasts, buttocks, thighs, back or pussy on a rotational basis, so no one part of her is marred for long. The prisoners don't seem to mind, and of course they are allowed to actually deliver some of the punishments as a reward for good behaviour.